Editorial
Raise all the Damned Bridge Tolls to $5
Three cheers! The Golden Gate
Bridge toll has been raised to $5! But more needs to be done.
SUV fetishists were appalled
that the Golden Gate Bridge District would suggest they pay their
fair share. When the usual attempts to bully and shout down toll
increase proponents failed to work, outrage by the car fanatics
turned to worry: might California’s long love affair with the
car be on the rocks?
Well, the Beach Boys sure aren’t
recording paeans to gridlock. For average folks, the convenience,
even the usefulness, of car driving is fading fast. Only the
wealthy can afford rolling living rooms, outsized SUV’s big
enough to make being stuck in traffic palatable. The average schmo
gets stuck paying the taxes to pay for a vast publicly-funded road
infrastructure and an Army to boot to keep the oil coming.
California’s carefree romp
with the automobile has soured into a S&M dirge, with the oil
and auto industries wielding the whip. Californians are fed up and
they’re not going to take it anymore.
The passing of California’s
car culture has been prematurely predicted before, but consider
that at the same time that the Golden Gate Bridge toll was being
increased, to the consternation of the Bush administration a bill
moved through the California legislature limiting greenhouse
gases,. This legislation is a knife in the heart to the auto and
oil industry.
The person responsible for this
landmark bill, arguably the most important environmental
accomplishment in a generation, is none other than Bay Area
clean-ferry advocate Russell Long. Dr. Long’s heroic achievement
requiring cars to clean up their act is closely related to his
call for an environmentally responsible comprehensive regional
ferry service. How so? Public transit, including ferry service,
must be dramatically improved. The average Californian, so often
overlooked in this era of wealthy special interests, needs a
viable alternative to the single-occupant car.
And the only way to pay for it
is by increasing bridge tolls and, better still, gasoline taxes.
So the question is, why not raise all Bay Area bridge tolls to $5
in accordance with the Golden Gate Bridge?
The money generated would allow
work to start now building clean ferries and expanding bus and
rail service. And, at $5, Bay Area bridge tolls would still be
significantly less than those in the New York metropolitan area
where they are commonly $7. So what stands in the way?
Political timidity in the face
of mindless anti-tax zealots. Even State Senator Don Perata, who
has long taken a courageous public stand in favor of increasing
bridge tolls, is willing to go only as far as proposing a $3 toll,
and then only for the Bay Bridge, leaving the Dumbarton and San
Mateo Bridges at $2. And instead of making the increase
legislatively, as would be permitted, Senator Perata wants to put
the matter before the public in the form of a regional bond
measure.
The political cognoscenti
tremble at the thought of raising taxes; such is the reflexive
revulsion for taxes of any kind on the part of the voting public.
Yet some taxes are both good and popular, such as levies on
tobacco and alcohol. Lots of voters smoke and drink, yet accept
the need to pay for the cost to society of their doing so. Why not
the same with driving?
The need to reduce oil
consumption and improve public transit is too important for our
quality of life and national security to wait. Moreover, a bond
measure requires two-thirds approval, affording effective veto
power to hard-core tax-the-poor-to-feed-the-rich anti-tax
fanatics. The California Legislature should act now, with the
wisdom it did in passing Dr. Long’s important greenhouse bill,
to immediately increase bridge tolls on all Bay Area
bridges to $5.