For Whom the Bridge Tolls
Some
of the Projects that are likely to be funded in SB 916: $1
Toll Increase
(Partial
list courtesy of TALC)
System-Wide Projects
· Earthquake safety
· Transbay Tube
· BART station upgrades
· Translink
· Nextbus
· Transbay owl service
· Regional express bus program
· Significantly increased regional ferry
service
San Francisco
· MUNI-3rd street (E line)
· Improved BART / MUNI connectivity
· Transbay terminal
· Increased express bus service
East Bay
· eBART
· Oakland BART Airport Connector
· Warm Springs BART extension
· East Dublin BART connector
· Improved Contra Costa express bus
infrastructure
· AC Transit BRT and enhanced bus service
· Express bus along I-580 to Tri-Valley
· Direct HOV / bus access from I-680 to
Pleasant Hill BART
· New Berkeley and Albany ferry service
North Bay
· SMART train extension
· Capital support for possible I-80 /
I-680 transit alternative
· I-80 HOV / bus lane connector from SR-4
to Carquinez Bridge
· Golden Gate Express Bus service over
Richmond Bridge
· Increased express bus service for
Solano County
· Increased ferry service
South Bay
· Dumbarton Bridge rail service
· New ferry service to South San
Francisco |
|
Senator
Don Perata announced the regional transit projects that
would be funded out of the proposed dollar toll increase |
On Thursday, April 17, Senator Don
Perata invited press and regional transit advocates to join him in
announcing the details of a comprehensive regional Bay Area traffic
relief plan, Senate Bill (SB) 916. This bill, which proposes a
dollar toll increase on state-owned bridges to fund regional transit
projects, is scheduled to be heard by the Senate Transportation
Committee on April 29. If passed through the Senate and then by the
Assembly Transportation Committees and approved by the full
legislature by majority vote, Bay Area voters in seven counties will
get to weigh in on the plan during the March 2004 election.
Specifically, voters in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco,
San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Solano counties will have an opportunity
to approve the measure. Surveys showed that 66% of Bay Area voters
would support the measure; passage only requires a 50% majority.
|
Christine
Zook, ATU Local 192, shown in front of a sea of t-shirts
proclaiming, "Labor Keeps Transit Moving" |
Senator Perata said, "We need
to use every opportunity to strengthen the Bay Area’s economy. If
this becomes law, we have a fighting chance to stay even with the
growth of congestion." Referring to those who will pay the
increased toll, he said, "Voters have shown overwhelming
support for this plan. We’ve seen that [they] will support fees if
we lay out a specific plan for how the money will be spent. We’re
not saying, ‘Trust us.’ We’re saying, ‘This is what your
money will buy.’"
|
Stuart
Cohen, Executive Director of Transportation and Land Use
Coalition, said, "What you won’t find in the Senator’s
plan is overly expensive ribbon-cutting projects. This
process weeded out projects that were not going to deliver
relief. How do you spell relief? SB 916 is clearly the
answer." |
|
Rallying support from around the
region, representatives from the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC), BART, the Transportation and Land Use Coalition,
local transportation and congestion management agencies, and transit
unions spoke in favor of SB 916. Framing the issue, Steve Hemminger,
MTC’s Executive Director, said, "What bridge commuters need
is more choices."
The Senate Select Committee on Bay
Area Transportation, chaired by Senator Perata, initiated hearings
in 2002 on the subject of bridge tolls and formed an advisory
committee. The final project list was developed through months of
lengthy meetings and negotiations with transit agencies, congestion
management agencies (CMA), environmentalists, and advocates and
staffed by MTC. During Fall 2002, the Advisory Committee held 15
|
Ezra
Rapport staffed the Senate Select Committee on
Transportation’s Bridge Toll Expenditure committee |
meetings to review proposed
projects. The projects were evaluated based on performance measures
such as number of new transit riders, impact on congestion, cost
effectiveness, transit connectivity, project readiness,
sustainability, environmental impacts, land use opportunities,
safety, social equity, and other considerations. Commenting on that
process, Dennis Fay, Director of the Alameda County CMA, said,
"We tortured each other over several months presenting
projects. Hopefully, this (SB 916) will be the path to
success."
|
Jim
Gleich, Executive Director AC Transit, rubs elbows with
union leaders Marina Secchitano, IBU, and Christine Zook,
ATU |
Christine Zook, President/Business
Agent of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 192, said, "The
only thing that working families spend more on than housing is
transit." In mid-March, transit unions joined forces to lobby
Sacramento legislators on the value of SB 916. Ms. Zook recognized
members of that coalition who filled two rows of the packed press
conference, wearing yellow t-shirts bearing their slogan, "TransitWorks:
Labor Keeps Transit Moving."
Summing it up, Tom Margro, Executive Director of
BART, pronounced Senator Perata’s bill "A bold vision for a
bold plan.