Waterfront Design
Roundtable
Getting The Bay Area Waterfront
Shipshape
Roma Design
Group, one of the premier urban design firms in the nation, has
agreed to sponsor a series of roundtable discussions on the
renaissance of the San Francisco Bay waterfront. The inaugural
meeting took place at a luncheon meeting on October 16, 2000 at the
Roma Design Group offices in North Beach and included the following
participants:
Boris Dramov,
President of Roma Design Group
Richard
Springwater, Partner, Wilson
Equity Office
Will Travis,
Executive Director of San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development
Commission (BCDC)
Jim Chappell,
President of San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association
(SPUR)
Jack F. Bair,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, SF Giants,
Peter Victor,
Vice President, Office Leasing, Boston Properties
James W. Haas,
Chair of the Committee to Remove the Embarcadero Freeway and citizen
activist
Diane Y. Oshima,
Manager, Waterfront Planning, Port of San Francisco
The meeting first
concentrated on the history of the development of the waterfront
over the last decade. With the demolition of the Embarcadero Freeway
in 1991,a major barrier was removed and the City became reconnected
to its waterfront. Now there are broad walks for pedestrians and
cyclists, and a palm-lined boulevard. A spacious new plaza links the
Ferry Building to Market Street. Historic street cars connect
Fisherman’s Wharf to the Ferry Building, where new ferry docks
will restore it as a major regional ferry terminal. The freeway
removal and the building of the new Embarcadero Roadway set the
stage for the renaissance of San Francisco’s waterfront. A new
ballpark has been built along the waterfront and the first season
has been successfully concluded. An exciting process is beginning
that will benefit the entire urban environment, including the
emergence of the new Gap headquarters, the new Muni hotel, the
renovation of the Ferry Building and Pier One, and the evolving
South Beach neighborhood.
South Beach
gradually became established and now thrives with the ballpark.
Similar success stories are envisioned with the upcoming cruise
terminal and renovation of the Ferry Building.
The Port of San
Francisco Waterfront Land Use Plan that came about in January 2000
was a breakthrough. The Bay Conservation and Development Commission
(BCDC), the Port of San Francisco, the State Land Commission, the
environmental community, the business community along with others
collaborated on this plan which was designed to provide a context
for planning and development along the San Francisco waterfront. It
consists of some very general criteria and policies that each of the
organizations brought to the table. For example, BCDC head Will
Travis wanted "the Bay to be a little bigger and (have more)
public access to the waterfront. (With this plan) we have something
that provides the flexibility and will allow those individual
visions as they come forth and the waterfront to be dynamic and
change over time".
The participants
agreed that no single project is responsible for the exciting
changes happening along the waterfront. Rather, a series of planning
efforts coupled with the earthquake set the stage. Added to this is
the involvement of the community and its push for diversity. Such
community involvement made the process take longer than many would
have liked but all agree that the result is a lot richer and worth
the extra effort.
Following are
excerpts from the discussion:
Community Process Leads to Diversity
Boris Dramov:
From a strategy point of
view, this waterfront was not created by one thing. Its diversity is
what distinguishes it. I was in Bilbao recently, which was a
phenomenal project that the Guggenheim did in that industrial city.
They were really looking at transforming this industrial riverfront
and came up with a great idea which was to join with the Guggenheim
and build a phenomenal structure. And to the greatest degree, it’s
been that single act that helped start things off. That’s not what
happened in San Francisco. In San Francisco, we have housing. We
have some offices. We have a ballpark. We have historic buildings.
It’s been a very different process. And as much as I do think that
the ballpark has been a phenomenal addition to the waterfront,
consider if you had built a ballpark with nothing around it in the
middle of an industrial area. Instead, the Giants came into an area
that already had many things going on and added to it. San
Francisco, from the beginning, didn’t go for the single fix, for
example with a convention center on the waterfront, the Sydney Opera
House on the waterfront, the Guggenheim on the waterfront, the
festival marketplace on the waterfront. Diversity takes longer but
the result is a lot richer. South Beach took a while and we see that
South Beach works really well with the ballpark. The cruise terminal
will come in and the freeway removal and all of that but what
distinguishes San Francisco to a great degree has been this process
that has allowed a very significant amount of diversity to be built
in.