Security Issues at the Port of San
Francisco
Cruise Ships and Ferries of
Particular Concern
A
Short History of the Port of San Francisco
By Wes Starratt
The histories of the Port
of San Francisco and the City of San Francisco are
intertwined. Both were located where they are and exist
because of the great bay of San Francisco, which has often
been referred to as "one of the largest and safest
land-locked harbors in the world."
San Francisco Bay joins
the ocean at a low point in the coastal hills that the early
Spanish explorers called la boca, or the mouth. But la boca
is only a little over a mile wide and well hidden from the
sea by coastal cliffs and fog. So well camouflaged is it
that, for some 200 years, Spanish and English explorers,
including Sir Francis Drake, sailed right by without ever
seeing it or the great bay beyond.
It took a land-based
expedition in 1769 under the command of Gaspar de Portola to
finally discover the bay. News of the discovery led to the
1775 expedition of Don Manuel de Ayala, whose ship, the San
Carlos, became the first to sail through la boca and drop
anchor in San Francisco Bay. One year later, in 1776, the
same year that the British colonies on the Atlantic coast
were proclaiming their independence from England, another
land-based expedition established Spanish military presence
at the Presidio near the entrance to the Bay and, some miles
away, church presence at Mission Dolores. The mission was
dedicated to Saint Francis, the patron saint of the
Franciscan Order, by Padre Junipero Serra who is said to
have proclaimed that "this is the port to which the
saint has led us!"
Between the mission and
the presidio was Yerba Buena Cove, the landing for annual
Spanish supply ships from Mexico, which was largely the
extent of trade until about 1820 when California came under
control of an independent Mexico. Trade restrictions were
then relaxed, and trading ships, many from Boston, became
frequent visitors to San Francisco Bay, exchanging
merchandise for hides and tallow from the California
ranchos. Still, the solitude of Yerba Buena changed little
until the dramatic events between 1846 and 1849 completely
transformed the entire region.
First, there was the
short-lived war with Mexico, culminating in a party from the
U.S. Navy's sloop-of-war, Portsmouth, raising the American
flag over the plaza, known today as Portsmouth Square, and
claiming the territory for the United States. A year later,
the name Yerba Buena was changed to San Francisco, then a
village of 50 or more buildings with almost 400 inhabitants
located on a shallow cove. Not long after, U.S. Army officer
John Fremont is credited with giving the prophetic name
"Golden Gate" to la boca, the entrance to San
Francisco Bay.
The next dramatic event to
take place was the discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill in
1848, leading to the gold rush of 1849 when hordes of
gold-seekers on hundreds of ships literally poured into the
Bay. During the year 1849, it is reported that more than 500
sailing ships carrying 40,000 passengers passed through the
Golden Gate.
The Bay became filled with
sailing ships at anchor, since ship berthing and docking
facilities were unable to cope with the onslaught. A year
before, a pier had been built near the corner of Broadway
and Battery streets. Then, a commercial wharf was built near
the foot of Pacific Street. Soon there were other wharves,
such as the Central Wharf at the foot of Commercial Street,
and another one at the foot of Broadway. Still, other piers
were extended into the Bay, reaching out to waiting ships.
Thus began the early history of the San Francisco waterfront…filling
the original cove and pushing wharves out to deep water over
an expanse of tidal flats, with cross streets built on piles
among rotting hulks of ships.
As gold mining began to
wane, economic growth continued and, before long,
disenchanted miners turned to developing California's
agricultural resources. An increasing number of vessels from
the East Coast and Europe began calling at San Francisco to
load wheat and barley.
Since the founding of the
State of California in 1849 and for many years to come, San
Francisco was California's only commercial port and the
state's sole gateway to the outside world. Other than a
trickle of cargo carried by overland stages, the majority of
commerce to and from the state passed through the Golden
Gate. But San Francisco's mish-mash of piers and wharves was
completely inadequate to meet California's demands. There
was a need to bring order out of chaos and build adequate
port facilities.
Because of the port's
economic importance to the state, the California State
Legislature stepped in, and in 1863 established a Board of
State Harbor Commissioners to manage the Port of San
Francisco. Between 1867 and 1914, the state board spent over
$120 million on harbor improvements, including the
construction of a six-mile-long stone seawall from a point
near Aquatic Park to the Third Street Channel at China
Basin. Sand dunes were leveled and dumped onto the
intervening mud flats where San Francisco's Financial
District now exists. At the same time, finger piers were
extended from the sea wall out into the Bay, and railroad
connections were built to serve the port's maritime
operations. The result is largely what we know today as the
San Francisco Embarcadero.
The state board controlled
activities on the San Francisco waterfront for over one
hundred years until 1969 when the City of San Francisco
regained control of its waterfront and established the Port
of San Francisco as a city department.
The first transcontinental
railroad reached the Bay Area in 1868, dramatically changing
the flow of commerce. For the first time, passengers and
goods could arrive by effective overland service, and the
Golden Gate was no longer California's only gateway. The
terminus of the railroad was on the eastern shore of the
Bay, requiring barges and ferries for the final stage of the
journey to the West's business and population center, the
City of San Francisco. Thus, began the age of the San
Francisco ferries, culminating in a fleet of some 60
ferries, the world's largest, and the construction of the
Ferry Building in 1898. The ferries, a major activity at the
Port of San Francisco until supplanted by the bridges, are
once again returning in the form of a regional system of
high-speed vessels.
Wartime activities have
had a strong impact on the Port of San Francisco. The
Spanish American War of 1898 gave the port a new role, that
of the country's foremost military base on the West Coast.
The impact of World War II was even more dramatic, with
almost every pier and wharf involved in military activities.
Both wars served as to dramatically increase Pacific trade,
which continues today.
The containerized
cargo-handling revolution of the 1960s had a profound impact
on shipping worldwide, facilitating the movement of cargo
from ships to trucks and trains, substantially reducing
handling the costs, and creating an increased movement of
cargo worldwide. San Francisco's finger piers proved
inadequate for container handling, and new facilities with
sufficient backup land for the handling and storage of
containers were built on the Southern Waterfront, as well as
bulk and break-bulk cargo facilities.
Today, San Francisco's Northern
Waterfront, highlighted by a refurbished Ferry Building with
its magnificent plaza and a broad Embarcadero, continues to
provide maritime services to fishing boats, tugs, pilot
boats, ferries, excursion boats, and an increasing number of
cruise ships. Non-shipping activities are highlighted by the
world-famous Fisherman's Wharf and Pier 39, which attract
tourists and conventioneers to the City in increasing
numbers from throughout the world. |
By Wes Starratt
The Port of San Francisco has
security concerns that are much more varied and complex than almost
any other port, encompassing not only a variety of maritime cargo
terminals, but much, much more including the dramatically increasing
cruise ship activity (that will soon necessitate the construction of
a new cruise ship terminal), world-famous tourist attractions such
as Fisherman's Wharf and Pier 39, major public access facilities
such as Pac Bell Park, renowned structures like the Ferry Building,
a commuter ferry terminal that is expected to grow dramatically as
the regional ferry system comes into being, excursion boat
terminals, a commercial fishing harbor and fish processing terminal,
a ship repair yard and dry dock, lay berths for Maritime
Administration vessels, the strategically important western
anchorage of the Bay Bridge, two major power plants, and numerous
public waterfront piers and promenades.
Furthermore, the Port's security
problems, which are already broad, diverse, and significant, are
expected to increase with the construction of new projects such as
the James R. Herman International Cruise Terminal at Piers 30/32, a
waterfront recreation project at Piers 27/31, an expansion of the
Pier 45 fish processing center, and the further development of the
southern waterfront.
Executive Port Director, Douglas
F. Wong, points out that, "The Port of San Francisco, like most
ports across the country, is facing the challenges of providing
unprecedented security requirements throughout its waterfront."
And that waterfront comprises 1000 acres of property, stretching 7½
miles along an urban bay-front adjacent to densely populated
commercial and residential areas.
Earlier this year, the U.S. Dept.
of Transportation announced a Port Security Grants program to
finance security assessments and security enhancement programs. The
Port of San Francisco submitted an application, and this summer was
awarded a $500,000 grant by the recently organized Transportation
Security Administration to conduct a comprehensive port security
analysis and assessment that would enable the Port to evaluate its
security concerns and identify appropriate mitigation measures. The
Port is currently in the process of selecting a qualified firm to
undertake the program, which will lead to an assessment of critical
security problems and enable the Port to participate in the upcoming
second round of federal grants to strengthen port security.
Not waiting for the results of the
assessment, the Port has been increasing perimeter security,
particularly at cargo terminals, and working closely with the San
Francisco Police Department's Marine Unit and the Coast Guard to
protect navigable channels. In addition the Port is seeking to
restrict access to the all of its terminals, including ferry
terminals, with improved signage, gates, and fences. The Port has
joined the Coast Guard's Port Security Committee to review issues
affecting the Bay Area's ports and terminals, and is holding
security briefings with concerned groups to meet the requirements of
the Coast Guard's Terminal Security Guidelines.
Of all the facilities on the San
Francisco waterfront, the Coast Guard has expressed particular
concern for the ferries and the cruise ship terminal, where
passengers are already subject to baggage-screening procedures not
unlike those encountered at airports. That security screening
program is expected to intensify as the number of cruise ships using
the Port of San Francisco continues to grow. The Port has also
increased the number of guards and the surveillance at the cruise
terminal, particularly at the height of the season.
Coast Guard Commander Jeff Saine
of the Marine Safety Office stresses that, "Two of our primary
concerns along the San Francisco waterfront are the cruise ship and
the ferry terminals. Yes, there is concern that there could be an
incident on a ferry, and we have reason to believe that there has
been some surveillance of ferry systems in this country. So, for
some time, we have been having our armed and uniformed sea marshals
riding the ferries on a random basis. They have been very well
received by the ferries and by the passengers. We are also working
with the Port Security Committee to identify shortfalls and
mitigations to heighten security awareness. The ferry operators, the
Water Transit Authority (WTA), and other concerned groups and
organizations have been participating. However, no one has yet
suggested screening ferry passengers and their carry-on items,
although passengers are being advised not to leave packages
unattended and sweeps are being made of ferries after each trip to
dispose of items left behind … so evidently no more lost and
found!"
In reality, it appears that, until
recently, there has been relatively little concern for ferry
security. In fact, the San Francisco Bay Water Transit Authority (WTA),
established before 9/11, has never received a legislative directive
from the state on passenger ferry security. Mary Culnane, WTA's
Manager of Marine Engineering, reported that, "We put in and
tried to get a federal grant for a maritime security study. Our
first request was rejected, but we will be putting in a bid for a
grant to do an assessment of ferry security in the next round of
federal grants.
"Starting the first of
January, WTA expects to convene monthly meetings with all of the
ferry boat people, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and
the emergency response staffs in the Bay Area to develop an
emergency response program. Most of the ferry operators are already
addressing security issues, and I understand that Captain David
Clark has already put together a comprehensive plan for the Golden
Gate Ferries."
Captain Clark, Manager of the
Ferry Division of the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway &
Transportation District reported to us that, "The primary thing
that we are doing is preparing and submitting security plans to the
Coast Guard and then implementing them. I do not want to be too
specific, but we are reviewing our policies and establishing new
procedures and working closely with the Coast Guard. In short, our
security plans are under development."
Port security continues to be a
matter of increasing concern, and the Bay Area's passenger ferries
are a part of it. But, even greater efforts are being made to
develop security plans for vehicular ferries such as those operating
on Puget Sound and at the Port of Seattle. |