Editorial
Terminator to Bay Area: Drop Dead!
Bay Bridge Fiasco Threatens to Swallow Public Transit
By Bobby Winston
Fellow “Rambo patriots” Arnold Schwarzenegger and George W.
Bush may share a “Who, me worry?” attitude generally when it comes to
elections, but every decent-thinking Californian should rise in outrage at
the Governor’s craven proposal to gut RM-2 to pay for Bay Bridge overruns.
Public transit advocates played by the rules and by a clean
vote of the people got passage of RM-2, raising bridge tolls by $1 and
dedicating the revenues to public transit. Regardless, the Governor, in
thrall to anti-tax zealots and car-crazies, did his level best to blithely
kick aside the democratic process and simply cast out all the public transit
projects.
Never mind that our wholly
unsustainable dependence on automobiles is central to the current terrorist
threat by way of our addiction to Middle East Oil. Put aside the growing
degradation to the Bay Area quality of life caused by car-driven sprawl.
These issues were considered by the people when they voted.
The problem of Bay Bridge retro-fit overruns is real. The answer is to
increase bridge tolls yet further to $4, why not $5, or even $6 dollars?
This will provide the needed revenue and DISCOURAGE CAR USE, which, God
knows why, seems to be the good thing that dare not speak its name. Yes, it
will be tough to get people to accept the need, but isn’t our tough-guy
Governor up to it? Or is it only the poor and the weak that have to take the
tough medicine?
Many Bay Crossings
readers share this page’s advocacy for a comprehensive regional ferry
system; you should know that the Governor’s plan would have killed these
plans in the crib.
So let’s say it out
loud right now. The Bay Bridge is the Bay Area’s Big Dig, that famous Boston
white elephant that took decades to build. That mammoth agency that
couldn’t–Caltrans–is apparently over its head in managing underwater
foundations and the self-attached suspension design they approved what seems
a century ago.
And now for the finger
pointing. The official record of it all is a real door-stopper, a cluster
buck-the blaming to me that runs an eye-blurring 19,216 words –no kidding.
Insomniacs can see for themselves; visit www.baycrossings.com and search on
“Bay Bridge Milestones.”
But here’s the
bottom line: our own Action-figure Governor is too delicate for this hot
potato. So when it comes to the safety and economic well-being of Northern
California, it’s “don’t call us, we’ll call you.”
Here’s Arnold’s ideas as to how to handle the latest Caltrans
bridge program numbers:
Wait until the last few days of the session before announcing the new
overrun numbers: $3.2 billion.
Feint: Make “an offer they can’t refuse.” In other words, force Bay Area
legislators to accept our deal or we terminate the project. The half-built
bridge is on you. Enjoy!
Bully: Rip off
public transit funds, never mind they were just by the voters, to pay for it
all. And if the costs rise again, well then, there’s more from where that
came from. We’ll let MTC raise the toll again.
Demagogue: Why should the Bay Area try to solve its
congestion problems when no one else in the State can? Don’t you know that
the State has already raided the State Highway Account and Public Transit
Account, suspended Prop 42, and last session tried to steal BART and AC
Transit’s property tax funding? All to pretend balance the General Fund
without a tax increase and gain 65% voter approval!
Punt: Deal with it after my mini-term!
Blame: It’s the Bay Area’s bridge design.
Right. Never mind that Caltrans participated in the design competition that
lasted 60 days and was staffed by UC engineers that advise Caltrans. Never
mind that Caltrans commented on all the applications and provided all the
cost estimating. Never mind that Caltrans is the lead agency on all the
State bridges and told everyone they would complete the job on time and on
budget as late as 2001!
So the
Legislature said NO to that deal and offered to keep the project going by
refinancing the existing tolls while a more equitable arrangement was
proposed.
But the Action Governor said
NO, I’ll veto, veto your bill. And I’ll huff and puff and shut the bridge
project down! Demobilize the contractor! Add more hundreds of millions of
cost to the job! And now I’ll wait, wait, wait, until you panic and crack!
So that’s where we are. The Bay Area can keep its ferries and
buses and trains and Translink–but the bridge–that will have to lead
nowhere. And if there is an earthquake, that will have to be the Bay Area’s
fault.